Dynamics of World Cinema

Transnational Channels of Global Film Distribution

 
Online research material
Film Festival Submission

Film Festival Submission: Case Study

In June 2011 an experiment documenting the cost, time commitment and overall efficiency of submitting a short film to two film festivals that utilise different means of accepting unsolicited entries was carried out. The goal of this experiment was to collect data so as to better understand how digital technologies have affected the ‘traditional' submission process undertaken by independent filmmakers when supplying unsolicited films to film festivals.

For those readers unfamiliar with the traditional method of entering a film into a film festival the first course of action sees event organisers announcing a call for entries. Through this call for entries the terms and conditions of film submissions are typically identified.  For example, the duration,  timeliness of the production and, in certain circumstances, the rules regarding the inclusion of a special item like those required by the Australian-based Tropfest (http://www.tropfest.com/) are clearly communicated [1].

It is common for each film festival to produce its own individual submission form. The result of this is that filmmakers are required to complete a number of different submission documents as they enter into various film festivals.  Similarly, screeners submitted to individual festivals are often destroyed.  So, filmmakers must have a ready supply of films they are able to send to each individual film festival. Interestingly, the key and often-tricky aspect of the traditional submission process is the actual delivery of the screener to the film festival. For example, when VHS dominated, the tapes had to be protected by bubble wrap as the standard, fibre-filled envelope often used to post valuable items was known to ruin the tapes. This situation changed with the rise of DVDs but nonetheless those submitting films still face numerous challenges ranging from confiscation by customs officials to lost or damaged mail.

In 2000 a revolutionary new method of submitting unsolicited entries to film festivals was developed by Withoutabox (WoB).  The company's founders identified the traditional method of film submission as being inefficient and largely redundant [2]. As a result they created a universal submission form that allowed filmmakers and film festival organisers to utilise a single electronic submission document, thus, effectively streamlining the submission process.  The advancements did not stop there, however; in keeping with the streamlining theme, WoB recently introduced an online screener option that allows participants to submit films electronically to film festivals. The process involves uploading a film to the Independent Movie Database (IMDb) website and is a viable alternative to the traditional method of physically posting screeners.  As explained by IMDb such a method is convenient, secure, high-quality, green conscious and risk-free [3].

The services offered by WoB represent a new and potentially more efficient method for submitting independent films to film festivals. However, to-date, no studies have been carried out to offer such evidence; hence, the rationale for conducting this experiment. The following chart compares the monetary costs and time commitments incurred as the investigator submitted the same short film into two film festivals that utilise different means of submission acquisition. Festival A is a mid-sized, regional film festival that utilises the traditional method of unsolicited film submission, so the investigator was required to complete a unique submission document and then physically post a screener to the film festival [4]. Festival B, also a mid-sized, regional event, is part of the Withoutabox film festival community and therefore uses the new method of film submission through the universal submission form and on-line screener delivery.

Data

Festival A

Distance from Edinburgh

5,103.55 (8,213.15 KM)

Total screener delivery cost

£46 ($72 USD)

Total time commitment

37 days (including post travel time)

Festival B

Distance from Edinburgh

5,151.85 (8,290.87 KM)

Total screener delivery cost

£32 ($50 USD)

Total time commitment

27 hours

Conclusion

The utilisation of digital technologies when entering unsolicited films into film festivals represents an economical and time efficient means of submission when compared to the more traditional method of sending a film via the post. While further data collection is required this experiment provides a basic starting point in which the advantages of a digitally-based, alternative distribution network can be identified. The services offered by Withoutabox do seem to streamline the submission process and ultimately enable filmmakers greater ease and opportunity when submitting their films to festivals.

References

Fischer, Alex (forthcoming) "‘The Fully Clickable Submission': How Withoutabox Captured the Hearts and Minds of Film Festivals Everywhere", in Dina Iordanova and Stuart Cunningham (eds), Digital Disruption: Cinema Moves On-line. St Andrews: St Andrews University Press.

Internet Movie Database (2011) "IMDb Homepage". On-line. Available HTTP: http://www.imdb.com/ (21 July, 2011).

Notes

72 Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE

[1] The Tropfest Signature Item (TSI) of 2012 is a light bulb.

[1] For a detailed history of WoB see Fischer (forthcoming).

[1] IMDb notes that ‘more than a million DVDs are submitted to festivals every year. By participating in Secure Online Screeners, you're giving the planet a needed break.' (IMDb 2011).

[1] Note that this experiment is part of a larger, forthcoming project so the names of the festivals involved have been removed.

 

 
An OSM Buoyancy Test at the Corona Cork Film Festival

An OSM Buoyancy Test at the Corona Cork Film Festival

Alex Fischer

Thursday, 25 2010

 

The Corona Cork Film Festival (CCFF) (www.corkfilmfest.org/) is one of Ireland's oldest operating film festivals. Founded in 1956 the event has brought film culture to the island's second largest city for 55 years. The festival is best known for its short film programme though feature films do play an intricate role within the festival's structure.

The following article discusses the outcome of a master class led by the author who was invited by festival organisers to present his research on film festivals.  This master class was titled ‘Cork Talks - Conceptualising Basic Film Festival Operation: An Open System Paradigm'. Those in attendance at the master class included the CCFF Festival Director/CEO, the CCFF Festival Manager, two CCFF board members, two organisers of the Cork French Film Festival (CFFF) (www.corkfrenchfilmfestival.com/index.php) and an associate from the Chicago Irish Film Festival (CIFF) (www.chicagoirishfilmfestival.com/).

The format of the master class consisted of a 50-minute power point presentation in which the author outlined his Open System Model (OSM) of film festival operation. This presentation was then followed by a lively 25-minute discussion in which attendees shared personal experiences framed within the context of the OSM.

This discussion was extremely valuable as it was the first time the ideas and theories behind the OSM were scrutinised in a public forum. Highlights included:

  • The identification and acknowledgement of specific importation-based strategies utilised by the CCFF operators. These strategies included the implementation of a date change as a means of increasing distributor and filmmaker participation and the importance of legitimizing affiliations in securing/maintaining film industry contacts.
  • The operational pitfalls of ceremonial obligations, i.e. red carpets, celebrities, film premieres, etc. Interestingly, the ideas regarding this topic bore a striking resemblance to a conversation the author had with Jean Michel Frodon at his presentation ‘Questioning the Contemporary Development of Film Festivals' a few days prior. (1)The conclusions arrived at in both discussions indicate that film festivals, as a collective whole, operate more as a swarm than a calculated circuit.
  • An examination of the bustling Cork social environment. That is, the number of activities and festivals operating in the city at any given time and the dangers/benefits this condition has on the CCFF's ability to retain an audience and financial backers.

In conclusion, the Cork Talks master class was very beneficial as it provided a unique opportunity for the author to discuss OSM concepts and theories with veteran practitioners. (2) Perhaps of greatest value were the anecdotal stories participants shared. As film festival operation is an individual process, such personal information is useful in ensuring the validity and practicality of the model.  The feedback from the participants suggests that OSM provides valuable insight into basic film festival operation and is a benefit to film festival organisers as it allows them to see the proverbial ‘wood for the trees'.

 



(1) Jean Michel Frodon is the former-editor in-chief of Cahiers du cinema. This presentation was part of an on-going lecture series hosted by the Centre for Film Studies at University of St Andrews, Scotland.

(2) In total there were 88 years of collective film festival experience at this master class - CCFF (55), CFFF (21) and CIFF (12).

 

Last Updated ( Thursday, 25 November 2010 14:48 )
 
Connecting the Communal Dots at the Vladivostok International Film Festival

Connecting the Communal Dots at the Vladivostok International Film Festival

Alex Fischer

Monday, 8 November 2010

Located on the southern end of the Muravyoy-Amursky Peninsula a port city named Vladivostok hosts a film festival. There is nothing novel about this; film festivals have become a mainstay of popular culture and it sometimes feels like there is barely a city or town without one. In directing attention to this particular event I aim to demonstrate the importance of keeping the ethos of the community in mind when attempting to sustain successful film festival operation (1) - something to my mind that often gets overlooked when a film festival reaches a certain operational age.

In discussing this topic, I will highlight two aspects that I believe make the ‘Pacific Meridian' Vladivostok International Film Festival (www.viff.vl.ru/en) (VIFF) unique. The first is the geographic placement of the festival with respect to its Asian neighbours and the importance programming plays in bonding the event to the historical and cultural values of the community. The second is the variety of community building activities the festival management employs to involve the population as a whole, and not just those interested in film.  This brief analysis and its conclusions derive from my observations and experiences when attending the 8th edition of this event in September 2010. (2)

Historically isolated and independent, Vladivostok is a city that requires innate understanding in order to operate a film festival to its fullest capacity. The official title of VIFF states it is an ‘International Film Festival of Asian Pacific counties' - an appropriate name given its geographic position. Located on the Eastern seaboard of Russia, the city is physically closer to Pyongyang, North Korea (688 km), Tokyo, Japan (1066 km) Seoul, South Korea (1661 km) and even Hong Kong, China (2838 km) than it is to Moscow (6410 km). This position must be considered when appealing to the local population.

A glance at the programme immediately signals diversity. There are works from Japan, South Korea, China, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Australia, New Zealand, the United States, Mexico, Peru and Chile to name a few. There are also films from further afield, countries that do not share the same watery connection such as Estonia, Turkey, Finland, Greece, India and Sri Lanka. A plethora of Russian films can also to be found as well as a special section dedicated to films made in Vladivostok itself. The films programmed ranged in size and scope but seemed to share a comradery with the ethos of the city and its territorial identity.

Such programming is essential to the success of the film festival as it allows the organisers to give the event a distinct character which is nonetheless congruent with its location and which does not conflict with the social systems of the population. VIFF, like the city of Vladivostok, is at the crossroads of the region. It is not distinctly Russian, but nor is it Asian; rather it is the product of more than century of intermingling of East and West.  If VIFF were to change its programming structure and place more emphasis on studio films from major filmmaking hubs instead of smaller, more independent films from neighbouring countries, it could risk cultural rejection. This is not to say the film festival would not continue to operate, but rather the community's investment in the event could be drastically reduced.

Another characteristic of the festival that enables the organisers to form a cultural bond with the community of Vladivostok is the range of activities it offers. Beyond the standard cinema experience the population is able to partake in live concerts, lavish ceremonies and even a football match.  Not only does the inclusion of such activities allow for a greater critical mass to participate in the festival - such as, families with young children unable or willing to attend a film screening in a theatre can easily enjoy an outdoor concert - but it gives the festival a less exclusive, more democratic feel. For example, close to 2,000 people attended the annual football match which pits the Governor of Primorsky Territory's club against a team comprised of various festival guests. (3)

Such an opportunity to mix art and sport is uncommon, but when done correctly can help to break down preconceived notions as to who actually benefits from the services provided by a film festival. The outcome of such community outreach programmes ultimately contributes to the overall awareness of the event and may have a direct financial impact by making it more attractive to sponsors and government agencies.

To conclude, the organisers of the Vladivostok International Film Festival have clearly taken into consideration the geographic and cultural characteristics of their city. Such understanding and cultural sensitivity is likely to facilitate community involvement and subsequently improve the chances of successful festival operation. However, it is possible that the festival will modify its operational structure, possibly even for the next edition (2011). If so, the impact that this will have on the functioning and success of the festival would make Vladivostok an interesting case study for an open system analysis and provide new data to help us predict the functional viability of film festivals in general.

 


1. The definition of ‘success' is based upon the Open System Model of film festival operation proposed by the author. This model sees film festival organisers having to accomplish a four-phase cycle of operation in order to remain viable and attractive to external participation. For more information see: Alex Fischer (2009) ‘Conceptualising Film Festival Operation: An Open System Paradigm', unpublished PhD thesis, Gold Coast, QLD: Bond University, School of Communication.

2. I am grateful for my experiences at the festival and the freedom to scrutinise and study the event that the organisers gave me.

3. It is interesting to note that the Governor traditionally gives significant funding to the film festival and that his football club, for which he also plays, has always won this match. However, this year the festival team was victorious and I cannot help but wonder if this will influence future funding.

 

Last Updated ( Monday, 08 November 2010 13:46 )
 
Interview with Short Shorts Film Festival 2005

Short Shorts Film Festival

An Interview with Seigo Tono,

Office Manager Short Shorts Film Festival

Alex Fischer

The following interview with Seigo Tono of the Tokyo-based Short Shorts Film Festival (www.shortshorts.org/2010/) was conducted on 29 August 2005 as part of Alex Fischer's Ph.D research examining the process of film festival operation. The interview was held in the Short Shorts Film Festival head office in Tokyo, Japan. Seigo Tono was the office manager at the time of this interview and he has since taken the title of festival director.

The festival began in 1999 under the name American Short Shorts with the goal of introducing ‘calling card' short films to Japan. Works screened during the first few years were primarily sourced in America with the intention of exposing Japanese filmmakers to this specific style of filmmaking. In 2002 organisers renamed the event Short Shorts Film Festival as the number of Japanese films screen was comparable to the international entries selected for programming. The festival is held annually in Tokyo but also tours major Japanese cities as well as select international destinations, e.g. Singapore. Since the time of this interview the festival has grown considerably. One of the most noticeable additions has been the formation of an Asian-specific programming stream called ‘Asian Shorts'.

ST: The festival was founded by Tetsuya Bessho, who is a prominent actor in Japan. He has done many films as well as stage productions. He has also done Japanese TV commercials, so he is very well known. If you name Tetsuya Bessho on the street people recognise him, know him. His first film was an American film, he got a small role in an American/Japanese co-production, a science fiction film (Solar Crisis, 1990, Dir. R. C. Sarafian and A. Smithee) in which Charleston Heston starred. It was science fiction about space and he was one of the crew members of the space ship. He was maybe 22 or 23, but ever since then he wanted to make his way in USA, but as a Japanese it is very difficult to find roles and so he came back and started his main career here.

He was very successful and he became quite famous and we see him on TV all the time and then he made a decision: he may want to try again in the States. That was 1997 or 1998. He wanted to go back just to see what would happen. This time his friend and business partner, his name is Douglas Williams, who is also the co-founder of the festival - you see him on the credit - took him to a short film screening without explaining to him the concept of the event. When Tetsuya saw these short films he was really impressed by it because they were so ‘short' and he could see what the director wanted to express. He had never seen anything like this in Japan, because in Japan the word for short film exists, it is called tanpen.(1)

AF: Tanpen?

ST: Tanpen is a short film, but our image of tanpen before the Short Shorts Film Festival was that it was some kind of experimental film that we were obligated to see when in elementary school. It is about morality or society or something like that. You know, we were forced to watch these boring films and so we remember always tanpen as such experimental films, weird films. So he wanted to change this image, replace it with entertaining films. He decided to call it ‘short film' like the American or English way. So we don't use the word tanpen in our publications. He wanted to create the same sensation in the Japanese audience and public that he felt during the screening he attended in Los Angles. So as soon as he came back, that was like 1998, he called his friends to see if anyone was interest in organising a short film festival. At the time, he didn't know anything about short film festivals in Japan or organising a festival.

So, he went to see other festivals in Japan and at the time there were very small short film, I wouldn't say festivals, but manifestations or some kind of a screenings around the city. These were organised by international people, ex-pats living in Japan. Occasionally, for the weekend, they would organise these small short film screenings in a café or something. Actually there were three, two other co-founders, Douglas Williams and Keiko Takahashi, her name is also in the catalogue. So, the three of them went around and attended various film festivals. They also researched other festivals and methods of funding. Of course Tetsuya is a well known person so many companies would help him, but not financially.

AF: In-kind contributions?

ST: Correct. Giving out flight tickets or hotel rooms.

AF: Basically, contributing to the overall festival.

ST: Some companies also gave him some money with the understanding that their names would be on the promotional material. There is also a company called Sunny Side Up who has been our PR firm since the beginning.

AF: Did they influence the brand labeling of the festival?

ST: No. But they have been a great supporter and because the president of Sunny Side Up is related to Keiko Takahashi who is the co-founder of the festival.

AF: O.K.

ST: At the time Keiko Takahashi was working for Sunny Side Up and Tetsuya Bessho and the president of Sunny Side Up are friends. I'm sure she introduced her sister Keiko since she was studying film in Hawaii. Sunny Side Up helped by bringing in some money and also helped with the promotions. They also helped with the airline companies so filmmakers could come to Japan.

AF: The pictures on the webpage from the official opening look fantastic! It must have been quite a sensation because it was sold out and people were packed up and down the streets. That was when it was called American Shorts right?

ST: The strategy Tetsuya used at that time was to focusing on location. He thought, "where should the festival be held?" Tetsuya decided to have the festival in the Harajuku Omotesando area where young people from the age of 15 to early 20s congregate. If you are 30 you are already kind of old for this area. Everything in Japan, all these trends, they all started in Harajuku. That's in the area's history.

AF: It's culturally known for that?

ST: Everything starts in Harajuku. The fashion starts from Harajuku and Omotesando is of course a sacred avenue. In this area they have all these expensive stores, so Tetsuya had to convince the Association of the Town Committee of Harajuku and Omotesando to allow the film festival to be held in that specific location. They are notoriously very hard to do business with. They are like the Godfathers of the town. At the time I wasn't there, it was only Tetsuya and Keiko. They had to bring the project in front of these ten Godfathers...with cigars you know?

They were like, "what could you bring to us?", so Tetsuya explained our initiative of having a short film festival and that such an event had never happened in Japan. He then explained that he thought many young people will come and eventually it would be good for the town and commercial business as well. So they finally gave their approval and this is really rare. They usually don't accept a project like this. It is usually through an introduction by someone who knows a member of the association.

I think that the success of the festival owes much to the fact that Tetsuya Bessho is a famous person instead of some independent event producer. Everybody knows Tetsuya from television and they trust him. They also realise that Tetsuya has a really good business mind. For many people it is hard believe that he is an actor because he is such a good businessman. He operates this company and is the president. Many famous Japanese television actors, stage actors start businesses. A little bit of moonlighting separate from their professional work. For example, they open up a little restaurant, or clothing stores. But usually it never works. It is very tough.

AF: It will open and then fade.

ST: Exactly, but Tetsuya Bessho does not want to have the festival like this. This is Tetsuya Bessho's festival. So, the first couple of years he really worked hard to promote it. Now, he tries not to show up in the businesses and that's why he hired me, to replace him. I now go to the Association to negotiate for things such as sponsorship.

AF: When did you come on board?

ST: The third year in 2000 but I began working for the organisation in 2001.

AF: OK. So you volunteered in 2000?

ST: No. I joined after the festival in July of 2000. Another thing, Tetsuya's proposal was accepted by another group of people who allowed us to have flags along Omotesando Avenue. This had a huge promotional impact. Usually, this is not allowed even if money is involved because the image of an event may not correspond to Omotesando and they will never accept it. To them money is not important but the image they created fifty years ago is, so they don't agree to every event that is proposed.

AF: Is that why the volunteers are so important? They clean up the streets?

ST: Exactly. One of the things we decided was that we needed to do something for the community. So, during the festival the filmmakers, student volunteers and festival organisers all participate in cleaning up the street.

AF: Would I be correct in saying that short films were brought here from America to stimulate local filmmakers into making similar productions. So the festival has influenced them right?

ST: Exactly, the first time we solicited for Japanese short films we received films that were not short films at all. Just somebody has taping your sister for 20 minutes without any editing. In a way it is a short film, you could say it is experimental. But it's not the kind of short film that we wanted to promote or show to the public. We wanted to promote short films and also encourage young Japanese filmmakers who may be able to sell the short films they make to the television, Internet companies or mobile companies. We are living in a time when filmmakers don't have to necessarily grow up and make feature films. They can make short films without money for mobile technology because they as distributors want all this short video content. They don't want to see a two-hour film on a mobile phone.

Tetsuya wanted to have an American Short Shorts Film Festival where you could experience a nice story in five or six minutes. The story begins, there's a struggle in the middle and then boom! A good ending. It took quite a while, I don't want to say educate, but since the Japanese student filmmakers had never seen such short films before they needed some examples. Through our festival we promote these kinds of films on national tours and many people, I think, will create an idea of what their films can be like.

AF: And it took off because there were 100 entries.

ST: The majority of the films we really couldn't show; they were quite bad at the time. But then, each year the skill level has gone up. You can check the programme. For example, out of the twenty official national competition films, we now call it our National Short Shorts programme - maybe half are made overseas. Many of these films are by Japanese who are studying abroad and decide to make a short film while there using local actors so it looks like an international short film.

AF: I would like to know more about the JAM productions.

ST: We only did JAM productions once. What happened was we invited a famous movie producer to be a member of the jury in 2001. He had never seen a collection of short films as such. He was so surprised and impressed, just like Tetsuya. So he called some famous Japanese directors in order to start making short films.

AF: Like the BMW films?

ST: Kind of. But it was for theatres not the Internet. A total of six shorts maybe two hours in length. The plan was, first theatre and then DVD and then television. The second year he hired different directors to make JAM Films 2, we weren't involved. So since then we were not involved in this project.

AF: Do you ever see going back down that path? Short Shorts performing as a facilitator of filmmaking? Do you every see Short Shorts doing its own in-house productions?

ST: In-house productions meaning?

AF: Like, starting like a film institute. Is that in the future of Short Shorts?

ST: Do you mean are we going to have a school?

AF: Yes, or something like that.

ST: Yes. As a matter of fact, in October there is the Tokyo International Film Festival. We will be collaborating with them and Tokyo Government-based agencies to have a one-day workshop. Because the focus is on Asia we are going to invite a famous filmmaker from Korea or China and a selected number of students, maybe five or ten to attend the workshop for the whole day. The schedule could be a lecture in the morning, shooting in the afternoon and maybe at night editing. Another possibility is a completely screenplay-based workshop. We have not decided yet.

AF: Wow, great...

ST: We are going to do it as well.

AF: It seemed like the festival was going in that direction...

ST: We also have Pacific Voice. We work as a consultant to other companies who make short films. We do that sometimes.

AF: You had the Louis Vuitton Special Screening and a screening at the Roppongi Hills Theatre. Do you like to move the festival around to different locations?

ST: Our dream is to have our own Short Short's Theatre, which we will have in 2007 in Yokohama. We will call this our Short Short's Film Centre.

AF: So you are moving to Yokohama?

ST: No, just an official theatre and every day we will screen short films as a commercial business. For the short film festival we will always stick with Omotesando. We would like to have a different venue like, for example, Roppongi Hills because it is a proper theatre.

AF: And that is for the twenty-four hour screening?

ST: All night screenings. We thought because there are so many programmes, for example, at 11:00 am on Sunday we have the National programme. But then if we have some other venues at the same time we can show international shorts, so people can choose. This is the same for the Clermont-Ferrand Short Film Festival. During that festival there are maybe seven or eight venues - the whole city helps the festival. All the movie theaters are involved with the festival. The organisers and also use a screening room at the university and the town community hall, the whole town is a part of the festival during that period. We would like to do something similar but the main Short Shorts Film Festival is not supported by a public element. We always have to look to balance the budget.

Right now they are making a new building along Omotesando. It is called Omotesando Hills. It is the same company that built Roppongi Hills. It is a huge complex that will be done next year in February or March. So we might have another room there when that time comes.

AF: It was TIFFCOM that helped you get the market going - is that right?

ST: This year it is not called TIFFCOM, they changed the name. In order to promote our event in July we screened the awarded films there in October. Now we will participate in the Asian Film Market.

AF: I read that.

ST: I went there and I saw so many people doing business, so it is a good start. But then in Japan, still, we don't have much of a market for short films, but I think it's coming because of the mobile phone. So many people use and make calls from everywhere.

AF: Last question, where do you see the festival going in terms of having this filmmaking workshop? You started out showing people what short films were, then they started making them through workshops. What else do you think your festival can do to promote short films?

ST: I think it would be nice if a Japanese filmmaker, a young filmmaker, was to win the Grand Prize in a future festival. So far the quality to win the international shorts is not there yet. There are so many good shorts sent into the festival. Also the number of international shorts submitted is greater than the number of Japanese shorts entered. But one day we hope that a national filmmaker wins the Short Shorts Grand Prize. This film could then be accepted into the Academy Awards and win an Oscar. It would be a nice route, through our festival a Japanese filmmaker won an Academy Award. It would give a lot of motivation to other young Japanese creators or filmmakers who want to do something with their ideas. Also, right now we are talking with the Ministry of Culture about the need to familiarise children with visual content. Our goal is to facilitate this programme. I hope to bring suitable short films selections to elementary school and public schools around Japan to have a seminar or workshop or even class.

AF: Fulfilling your mission statement to spread cultural ideas.

ST: It is better to start young when teaching children how to communicate through visual media. They can understand that short films are fun but we can also teach them that there is another way to communicate through visual content. And, sometimes you should not be tricked by what you see, because the media can trick you as well. Universities too, we would like to bring our selections to these institutions and have an opportunity to show them as well. So we would like to get into an educational model as well.

AF: Do you think if Short Shorts didn't exist there would still be a lack of short films coming out of Japan? Is there competition from other festivals that have started to copy your ideas?

ST: There are other film festivals that screen short films starting up. Like the Kurosawa Short Film Festival.

AF: But what if Short Shorts never existed?

ST: I don't think there would be the same impact on short films if we didn't exist. But surely because of the mobile era now, I think many companies would have discussed or developed short video content like characters like for games. But maybe they would not think of short films.

AF: You have done so much, it is really amasing to think that it all started  with the films being sent over from America and then incorporating them into the Japanese culture. I'm sure there are spin-off festivals that started up after they saw what you were doing.

ST: I'm not sure, but I don't think there would have the same short film hype that we have now if we didn't exist. I think, again, the film festival's success owes a lot to Tetsuya. In part it's his strategy but it also helped that he was a famous person. Many people would listen to him and there was lots of press coverage following him. For example, if there's a National Tour and he participates, the media will come to take his picture for the next newspaper. If it was me, just a managing director, there may be a small notice that the festival was starting, something, but nothing like the coverage Tetsuya Bessho would attract because he's a famous person.

AF: It helps that you got George Lucas as well as other iconic people involved.

ST: Once we got Lucas' support letter we could approach Roman Polanski. It was about creditability and stuff like that.

AF: Things caught on that's for sure. With regard to the original mission statement, do you think it is true today?

ST: I think so, yes. In the beginning it was to exchange culture, visual culture and content, between America and Japan because we started with American Short Shorts. But we are doing this internationally now. Our second stage is to promote more Japanese short films abroad and introduce an educational component. Starting something like the Sundance Film Institute. Who knows, there might be a Short Short's Film Institute or something in the future. I think that is what Tetsuya also has in mind.


 

 (1) This appears to refer to what Stephen Teo identifies as the Hong Kong colloquialism "tsaan pin" which is defined as "meaning damaged or deficient films"  (Teo, Stephen (2009), ‘Asian Film Festivals and Their Diminishing Glitter Domes: An Appraisal of PIFF, SIFF and HKIFF', in Richard Porton (ed) Dekalog 3: On Film Festivals. London, Wallflower Press, p. 111).

*DISCLAIMER: This interview is made publically available with the permission of its author participant.   

 

Last Updated ( Monday, 18 October 2010 22:24 )
 
Interview with JVC Tokyo Video Festival 2005

 JVC Tokyo Video Festival

An Interview with

Toshiharu Yamamoto, Department Head, and

Akihito Nakakuki, Event Manager, JCV Tokyo Video Festival

Alex Fischer 

The following interview with Toshiharu Yamamoto and Akihito Nakakuki of the JVC Tokyo Video Festival (JVC TVF - www.victor.co.jp/english/tvf/index.html) was conducted on 4 April 2005 as part of Alex Fischer's Ph.D research examining the process of film festival operation. The interview was held in the JVC head office in Tokyo Japan with the aid of translator Mizuho Fukuchi. Though much has happened to the festival in five years, most notably its discontinuation in 2009, the interview still presents valuable information discussing such aspects as submission saturation, public awareness, and single source sponsorship.

It can be posited that the collapse of the JVC TVF is connected to the 2008 merger between Kenwood Audio and Victor, the parent company of JVC. It was reported that through this merger the two companies ‘agreed to develop future car and home audio systems together'. (1) The decision to focus on audio systems no doubt caused the JVC TVF to become obsolete within the business strategy of the newly formed company. In closing, while predicting when a film festival will fail to operate remains generally unsystematic, signs such as this merger may be used as an indicator that an event is facing new operational obstacles that may lead to disorganisation.

AF: The JVC Tokyo Video Festival is a unique event that attracts video works from a variety of people around the world. The strength of the festival seems to come from the diversity of its entries in terms of each individual filmmaker's background. How has this broad participation affected the festival?

AN: I cannot exactly say why the participants are attracted to the festival, but they are. First, there is a greater range of people because there aren't any restrictions with regard to being a professional or amateur or your nationality or gender. The theme is free; it is not a competition. We do not decide superiority or inferiority. But we want to provide a place that people can communicate through an image. We always get current affairs and personal themes, so the films entered and the participants have been changing with the times. That is one of the reasons why the Tokyo festival has survived.

AF: How about the range in the entrants' ages?

TY: Entries come from people aged twelve or fifteen to ninety-four years old.

AF: This is such a wide demographic.

TY: I will add to Nakakuki's comment on the first question. We do not set the specific theme, so that means we can always receive timely and current affairs-based topics which are changing each year. That is one of the reasons. The second reason is that this is not a competition, it is a lower hurdle for the entrant, so everyone can enter. These are the two main reasons why we receive timely films each year.

AF: And that is where the whole ‘Citizen Video' comes into play?

TY: About 20 years ago Sony and Panasonic copied us and started their own video contest. But it was a contest and they used it as a promotional tool to increase sales. These two purposes, the contest and promotion, were obvious. In a contest you have to measure one film against another. So, professional entries always end up at the top and the other people who enter will lose their goal and over time they will give up. They think, ‘no chance, only the winner will win lots of money, so why enter?' Then the contest will be of interest for only a few professionals, specific people.

AF: The JVC TVF is currently using publications, the Internet and a DVD for promotional purposes.

TY: We have a DVD for all submissions each year, but we don't sell them.

AF: What is the goal of the festival, in terms of percentage, between active participants, those who enter films, and passive participants, those who watch the films?

TY: There are only a few people who actually make videos. It is the same with music. That is, many people enjoy music but there are only a few people who create the music. The best thing is 50/50, or equal, the creators equal their audience.

AF: How does JVC reach its audience? It is obvious that you can reach the filmmakers because you have 3,000 films submitted.

AN: One way is through the website. The second is through the theatre located under the JVC building.

TY: Another thing is the local screenings. It is only in Japan, but every year we tour regional areas, fourteen or fifteen places, between Hokkaido to Okinawa, showing this year's TVF entries. During the screening, we don't only show the films, the judges also tour and lecture as to how to view and make films. We call this a seminar. The most important thing is how to watch the films.

AF: Are they teaching school kids and communities to critically watch television?

TY: No, not kids, we try to reach older generations, such as members of video clubs.

AF: Is one of the reasons why you receive so many videos is the result of these judges and their seminars?

TY: Yeah.

AF: Do you have any ambitions to go international then? The same type of event in South America or Europe?

TY: Yes, I want to. There is a programme called the Nippon Connection at Frankfurt University, in Germany. This is a programme to introduce Japanese culture to people in Frankfurt. This programme has been held for a couple of years. Until last year they mainly screened commercial movies such as Zatôichi/ The Blind Swordsman: Zatoichi [Dir. Kitano, Japan, 2003] to introduce Japanese culture. But for first time this year in April, some films from TVF were screened. Because we don't have enough staff it is hard for us to go overseas or use the overseas branch's staff. So, for example if we want to choose Australia, we will ask the film festivals in Australia to screen our films. That is the best way.

AF: JVC, in my opinion, was able to achieve the goal it set out in 1978 ‘to develop a new image culture by means of video'. Was this possible because it was a privately sponsored event? Allowing it to develop without the pressures that publicly-funded festivals must face?

TY: (to Nakuki): We feel the same kind of pressure, don't we?

AN: Yes, we do.

TY: Especially because JVC is the only sponsor it all depends on their economic performance. When JVC is not making a profit, we will be criticised by other divisions of JVC. The founders of this festival have been patient of this criticism, even now. Same as with other cultural or sports events, the company can only plan these kinds of events when you make a good profit. Now we are in the red and all of the other divisions ask us ‘What are you doing?'

AF: How about in terms of JVC's ability to facilitate the ‘Citizen's Video'? Because the event has one sponsor it is one vision and you don't have a lot of people pulling at it.

TY: That is our strong point, our merit.

AF: OK, last question. This is about the future. The festival guidelines state that there are no fees or limits on entries, and that it is open to anyone regardless of video experience. What will the JVC TVF do to address the issue of submission saturation, and how does it plan to change its structure to facilitate the number of future entries on both a local and international level?

AN: Currently, we are publishing a brochure for more than 10 countries, but it is difficult to do this with paper so we want to use the website to advertise. The screening must remain the same if it is going to be outside of Japan. But overseas we can cooperate with more universities. Using the Internet we can screen the films everywhere in the world. So we would like to utilise the Internet more in the future.

AF: Are you ever worried you are going to receive too many entries?

TY: We are working on a tight schedule so we do worry about it. We are trying to get more helpers to pre-judge the videos.

AF: That has to be a huge job for the judges to watch all those videos

TY: In our current structure 3,000 videos is the limit. If we get more than this then we will have to think of another way. One of the reasons we receive so many entries is because of China. We got 930 entries last year, 600 this year from this country alone. It seems likely we will get a 1,000 in the future. Another is Korea, from whom we received 400 entries this year. In international entries we are receiving more and more, especially from these two countries. For example if we can cooperate with Shanghai International Film Festival (www.siff.com/MovieEn/Default.aspx) or Seoul International Film Festival (www.senef.net), these events will serve as TVF's preliminary nominations. The chosen entries will be entered into the TVF. We need to change our structure to accomplish this, otherwise will not be able to handle that many entries.

AF: I was wondering what you were planning to do.

TY: Tokyo Video Festival in Shanghai. The hard thing about this is that you need to educate the judges, teach people how to watch film, develop specialists. You can do this [a preliminary judging in other countries] if only you have a good base.

AF: What do you look for in your judges? According to their bibliographies they are pretty individualised.

AN: Because there are no themes, we need judges who can understand the timeliness of the work, how it is relevant to the world at that particular time. Not that the work is good or bad, or the competence of the filmmaker's technical qualities; but whether the film has a personal vision for the current affairs. Someone who can do that and read the world. We need that kind of person.

AF: This is one of the very few festivals where the judges have so much weight so early on in the selection process. It is not just an artistic director saying ‘this is the programme'- each judge is generally invested in selecting films.

AN: This is this year's TVF's brochure [hands Fischer the brochure] and these are the judges' comments.

TY: We receive many entries from China and Korea, but from Australia, America or France, the entries never seem to increase. And from developed countries most of the entries are from professionals. We want to expand more and more. A few years ago video changed from analog to digital. When it became digital there was no difference between the amateur and the professional with regard to the final product. 90% of all entries are using non-linear editing systems so it is difficult to tell who is a professional and amateur by their films.

AN: Also female entries are increasing because the camera has a more compact size.

 


 

 

(1) Ogg, Erica (2008), ‘JVC, Kenwood officially hook up', NewsBlog. Online. Available HTTP: http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9941913-7.html (25 August 2010). 

*DISCLAIMER: This interview is made publically available with the permission of its author and participants.