Panels and shortlisting
Panel constitution
The Panel should be made up of a minimum of three people including the PI who will be the Convenor. Up to two additional members may be added to the panel, although HR advise this should only be for senior posts (grade 8/9).
Please note that the Head of School will be added automatically as a silent panel member so that they are aware of all recruitment activity taking place in their area.
It is also possible to appoint appropriate external panel members to any panel depending on their specialism and/or where the post is part of a joint project/initiative with another University or organisation.
All panels should be mixed gender to avoid issues of unconscious bias. Additional panel members may be added from other Schools or from Human Resources if it is impossible to achieve this within the School.
Please also bear in mind any conflict of interests, whether personal or business related, when appointing panel members. Further details can be found in the Declaration of Interests policy and by seeking advice from the Recruitment team where necessary.
Training for panel members
The University has a policy on mandatory training which includes training relevant to the recruitment of staff. If not already done so, prior to becoming a panel member everyone must undertake:
- Recruitment and Selection online training
- Unconscious Bias training
- Diversity in the workplace training
These courses are hosted by the Organisational & Staff Development Services (OSDS) where you will find links to the short modules under the 'all employees' section.
Even if the above training has been undertaken already, panel members may also find it useful to review this short unconscious bias video as a refresher prior to sitting on a panel. In addition, a longer, optional Recruitment and Selection training session is periodically offered by Organisational & Staff Development Services in conjunction with the HR Recruitment team. Details will be made available to staff as these sessions are scheduled.
Instructions on how to access the e-recruitment system and review applications will be sent to all panel members when the vacancy is advertised and an email, with shortlisting instructions, will be sent when it closes. The recruitment team can also provide one to one training on all aspects of using the system if required.
Convenor responsibilities
The Convenor or Chair of the panel has a number of responsibilities in addition to the other panel members at various stages of the recruitment process.
At advertising stage
Write advert/Further Particulars and send to the recruitment team |
Decide on where to advertise outside of the normal outlets if required and request costs from the recruitment team |
Be a point of contact for informal enquiries from applicants prior to interview |
Choose panel members (liaising with the Principal’s Office for academic/senior appointments if required – see checklists) and notify the recruitment team |
At shortlisting stage
Decide shortlisting matrix/scoring method if used |
Chair long/short listing meetings, guiding discussion and taking casting vote if necessary |
Decide on format of interview and any selection exercises such as presentations or tests |
With the panel, decide on interview questions |
At timetabling stage
After shortlisting meeting, complete Interview Details form (Word, 223 KB) and send to recruitment team to allow them to draw up timetable |
On receipt of final timetable from recruitment (following candidate acceptance), organise Teams interviews or venues if holding in person – this may be delegated to an administrator within the School/Unit |
At interviewing stage
Chair interviews – make introductions/closing remarks and ask some questions |
Chair post interview discussions to agree successful candidate and take casting vote if necessary |
Collate feedback from panel members and provide a summary to candidates when asked (following shortlisting/interviews) |
At appointment stage
Make verbal offer to successful candidate – confirm start date, salary and any other conditions of offer |
Personally update unsuccessful internal candidates following interview (the recruitment team will follow this with the official regret email) |
Complete Details of Appointment Form (Academic) (Word, 236 KB) with successful candidate’s details and send to recruitment team to allow them to issue written offer |
Longlisting
While it may not always be necessary to produce separate long and shortlists due to smaller candidate pools or time pressures, when such a step is required all panel members must take part in both the longlisting and shortlisting stages.
As the aim is to conclude the interviews within a single day, ideally longlists should consist of:
- 10 people if the shortlist is to be reduced to four
- 12 people if the shortlist is to be reduced to five (or six when there are multiple posts on offer)
Notes should be retained on longlisting recommendations as these will be used to justify decisions to include/exclude candidates if challenged. Panel members should be aware that candidates may request sight of any notes related to their application and recruitment experience so these should be written accordingly.
In order to be GDPR compliant, only the panel members should review the applications. It may be possible for another subject matter expert to review the applications, but generally those people would be a panel member. Please seek advice from the Recruitment team if unsure.
Shortlisting
Instructions on how to access the e-recruitment system and review applications will be sent to all panel members when the vacancy is advertised and an email, with shortlisting instructions, will be sent when it closes.
Generally shortlists should consist of up to five people for a single post and up to six if interviews are being held for two posts on the same day.
Where the pool of potentially appointable candidates permits, it is desirable to keep one or two candidates in reserve to make up the shortlist should any of the chosen candidates pull out of the recruitment process. These reserve candidates will be held in abeyance until such time as the final timetable is confirmed (see Interview timetables).
Where the quality of the candidate pool permits, shortlists should be of mixed gender. If this is not possible, the Principal's Office may request that the post is readvertised (for senior posts).
Notes should be retained on shortlisting recommendations as these will be used to justify decisions to include/exclude candidates if challenged. Panel members should be aware that candidates can request sight of any notes related to their application and recruitment experience so should write these accordingly.
If the candidate pool only yields only one or two potentially appointable candidates, you may wish to consider extending the closing date or advertising elsewhere. HR will notify existing candidates if this is the case. If, after extending the search, there are no further potentially appointable candidates, then it is advisable to interview those you originally identified in order to assess if they are suitable for the job or to rule them out in the event that the post has to be readvertised.
Failure to shortlist
If the panel is unable to shortlist any candidates, then:
- the Convenor should update HR who will regret the candidates
- the Convenor may readvertise at that point considering alternative outlets
- the Further Particulars should be reviewed and refreshed indicating that previous candidates need not reapply
Alternatively, the Convenor may wish to take some time to consider future strategy which may, or may not, result in a future readvertisement. As part of staffing complement management, HR will contact the Principal Investigator for an update as to whether the post is still required if it has remained inactive for four months.